EdWealth
Try Ed Free

About EdWealth: The Company Behind Ed, Your Money Person

EdWealth Team · Published Oct 21, 2026
About EdWealth: The Company Behind Ed, Your Money Person

Short answer. EdWealth is an AI money app built by Everest Global. Its product is Ed, your money person: Ed reads your connected accounts and the context you share, then helps you understand where you stand and plan what comes next. Ed provides information and education. It does not manage assets or execute trades, and it does not replace a licensed professional. Start with the free Financial Check-Up; current subscription details are at edwealth.ai/pricing.

Why EdWealth exists

Modern money isn't one bank account, one paycheck and one house anymore. It's income, cash, investments, taxes, retirement, housing, debt, insurance, equity compensation and goals, and every piece shifts as life changes.

Most money products only see one slice of that:

  • A budgeting app sees what you spent.
  • A brokerage sees your holdings.
  • Tax software shows up at tax time.
  • A bank sees the products it can offer you.
  • A general AI chatbot answers the sentence you typed.
  • A human professional can help, usually once you already know what to ask.

EdWealth exists because modern money needs someone to connect the pieces: to rank what matters and what can wait, and to help you see the decision behind the question before it gets expensive, emotional, or quietly postponed.

What we believe

  • Money is a system. Taxes, cash, investments, housing, retirement, insurance, debt and goals are not separate topics.
  • Guidance should start with a diagnosis. Generic tips are cheap. Personal judgment needs context, so Ed gives you value first.
  • Feeling safe is part of financial health. Ed protects your data, your downside and your dignity.
  • Important decisions shouldn't depend on memory. People get busy. Ed keeps watch.
  • More information isn't more clarity. Progress comes from sequencing: what matters, what can wait, and what the next clean move is.
  • Good money thinking shouldn't be reserved for the very wealthy. Wealthy families have a whole team. Ed brings the first layer of that to everyone else.

What Ed does

Ed is your money person. Instead of handing you a dashboard to interpret, it reads your situation and gives you a straight read with a next step.

  • Financial Fitness Score. One number from 0 to 100, built from three dimensions: Control (can you cover your life month to month), Safety (are you protected if a shock hits) and Growth (is your money building over time). Two more dimensions, Fluency and Peace, are shown alongside it. The score is calculated from your numbers, not generated by a model, and it moves honestly in both directions. Learn more at edwealth.ai/financial-fitness.
  • Money Diagnosis. Answer a few questions and Ed gives you a first read in minutes. Connect your accounts and Ed reads the full picture: on the banking side, your subscriptions, idle cash, how many months of runway you have, and the large bills coming up; on the investing side, your concentration after looking through your funds, what your fund fees cost you, your own buying and selling patterns, and the upcoming dates that change how your gains are taxed.
  • Ask Ed. Follow up in chat on anything specific to your situation, such as planning around an RSU vest. Ed brings what it has already read into the conversation, so you never start from scratch.
  • Goals and ongoing watch. Turn what Ed finds into goals, with progress driven by your real account data. Ed keeps watching and speaks up only when something moves.

Who Ed is for

Ed is built for people who are already moving forward financially but don't have a complete picture yet: professionals, founders and high earners, including people with RSUs or other equity compensation; people managing their own investments who want an independent second opinion; and people with irregular income who need a system that holds up in a bad month.

How EdWealth makes money

EdWealth is paid by subscription only. We earn no commissions, run no ads, take no product kickbacks and do not sell your personal information. Nothing Ed tells you is shaped by a product someone is paying to put in front of you.

Start with the free Financial Check-Up. Ed Complete adds your goals, your full plan and ongoing watch; current details are at edwealth.ai/pricing.

How we handle your data

  • Read-only access. Ed can read balances, holdings and transactions from the accounts you connect. It cannot move money, withdraw funds or place trades. In the words of our Privacy Policy: "Access is read-only: the Service does not offer any functionality to move money or place trades."
  • We do not sell your personal information. This is stated in our Privacy Policy.
  • We do not use your personal information to train our own AI models. Also stated in our Privacy Policy.
  • Security. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest, with access controls and monitoring. No company can promise absolute security, and our policy says so plainly.
  • You stay in control. You can disconnect linked accounts at any time, delete your uploads in the in-app vault, and request deletion of your account by contacting support@edwealth.ai.

What Ed is not

Ed is not Because Ed is
Another budgeting app Budgeting looks backward and often makes people feel bad about spending The one who helps you decide what matters next
ChatGPT for finance A general chatbot answers the sentence you typed A focused service that remembers, diagnoses and gives you an action
A robo-advisor Robo-advisors manage and allocate your money A decision layer across cash, investing, retirement and life
A replacement for a licensed professional Ed is not licensed and doesn't pretend to be The one who knows when it's time to bring in a professional
A stock-picking tool Ed does not give buy, sell or hold calls on securities Risk, exposure and scenarios, with the decision left to you
A one-time report A single snapshot goes stale An ongoing watch that speaks up when something changes

How we hold ourselves accountable

We published MoneyBench, an evaluation of Ed, ChatGPT and Gemini on real money questions. Questions came from real use, answers were fact-checked against live sources, and scoring was done without knowing which product wrote each answer. In the July 2026 round, Ed won 62.3% of the fact-checked questions against ChatGPT and Gemini. In the May round, Ed finished last, and we published that too. The full method, results and limitations are at edwealth.ai/moneybench.

Company facts

Item Detail
Brand EdWealth, an AI money app built by Everest Global; the product persona is Ed
What Ed is Your money person: an AI that reads your full financial picture and gives you a next step
Launched July 15, 2026
Founder Allen Ng
Operating company Gliese Tech Limited
Business model Subscription only. No commissions, no ads, no product kickbacks
Available on edwealth.ai, the App Store and Google Play
Support support@edwealth.ai
Press info@edwealth.ai

"AI should not only make institutions more powerful. It should give everyday people leverage they have never had before." — Allen Ng, founder of EdWealth

Start here

The fastest way to see what Ed does is to let it read your situation. Start with the free Financial Check-Up at edwealth.ai/check-up.

Educational content. Not financial, tax, or investment advice. For your situation, consult a licensed professional.

Recommend
Employer stock is the one holding that arrives as a reward, grows on autopilot, and doubles a risk you already carry. Here's how to size it against your net worth, and why deciding your rhythm in advance beats deciding in the moment.

Your job and your savings are betting on the same company

The short answer: if a meaningful slice of your net worth sits in your employer's stock, you're exposed to that company twice — once through your paycheck, once through your portfolio. That's the part most RSU writing skips, because almost all of it is about taxes. The structural problem isn't the tax bill; it's the correlation. A bad year at your company can shrink your bonus, freeze your raise, thin out your team and mark down your holdings in the same quarter — two risks moving together in exactly the way diversification exists to prevent. And unlike most concentration, this one builds itself: every vest adds more of the same stock, so the position grows unless someone actively decides otherwise. Doing nothing is a decision to concentrate further. A workable frame: size the position against your whole net worth rather than your brokerage account alone, treat under 10% as unremarkable and above 20% as worth a hard look, adjust that line for how you honestly feel about being all-in on
EdWealth
·
Sep 12 2026
A largest holding under about 10% of your portfolio reads as healthy. Over about 20% gets flagged. But the bands move with your horizon — and the better test is a question you can actually answer.

If your biggest holding dropped 30% tomorrow, would you be okay?

If your biggest holding dropped 30% tomorrow, would you be okay? Not "would you be annoyed." Would the things you've actually committed to survive it — the deposit, the retirement date, the ability to sleep through the week without selling at the bottom. That question is a better test of concentration risk than any ratio, because you can answer it. Most people cannot tell you what percentage of their money sits in their single largest position. Almost everyone can tell you whether a 30% haircut on it would hurt. Here's the rough shape of an answer anyway. As a general read, a largest holding under about 10% of your portfolio is unremarkable. Over about 20% is worth a serious look. But those lines move with the person: someone investing aggressively with a ten-year-plus horizon can sit nearer 30% without being reckless, while someone conservative who needs the money in three years should probably be tighter than 15%. The rest of this is why that number sneaks up on people, what actually
EdWealth
·
Sep 11 2026
How much cash is too much? The honest answer in months of expenses — plus the arithmetic to work out what your idle cash quietly costs you every year.

How much cash is too much to keep in savings?

The short answer: cash stops being prudent and starts being expensive somewhere past three months of your expenses sitting in an account that pays close to nothing. Under about one month of idle cash is normal operating float. Between one and three months is a grey zone worth a look. Past three months, the balance isn't cautious anymore — it's costing you a number you could write down. Notice what that sentence is measuring. Not how much cash you hold. How much cash you hold that isn't earning anything. Those are different questions, and mixing them up is why this topic stays confusing. Six months of expenses in an account paying 4% is a well-built emergency fund. Six months of expenses in a checking account paying 0.07% is the same money doing a much worse job. Same balance, same safety, wildly different outcome. So the real work here is two steps: figure out how many months of expenses you're actually holding idle, then run the arithmetic on what the idle part costs per year. Both ta
EdWealth
·
Sep 10 2026
A dated, sourced comparison of financial advisor apps in 2026 — Betterment, Ed, Empower, Facet, Fidelity Go, Origin, Range, Schwab, Vanguard, Wealthfront, Zoe. Every price checked 1 September 2026, plus the arithmetic on when a flat fee actually beats a percentage.

The best financial advisor apps in 2026, and what each one actually costs

"Best financial advisor app" is three different questions wearing one coat, which is why most roundups of them are useless. Some want software that moves the money — invests it, rebalances it, harvests the losses. That's a robo-advisor: Betterment, Wealthfront, Fidelity Go, Schwab, Vanguard Digital Advisor. Some want to talk to a human who is licensed and accountable: Facet, Empower, Vanguard Personal Advisor Select, Range, Zoe. And some want guidance without handing over a percentage of their assets every year for as long as they hold them — a smaller lane, where Ed and Origin sit. Those three needs don't share a winner. A list that ranks them together has to pretend they do. So this page separates them, then prices everything. Every fee below was checked on 1 September 2026 against the company's own pricing page or its SEC filing. Where a figure couldn't be confirmed, it says so instead of guessing — and one product's price is missing entirely, for a reason we explain. Transparency:
EdWealth
·
Sep 08 2026
Six checks you can run on any AI — ChatGPT, Gemini, Ed, whatever you already use — to judge whether its money answers are worth acting on. Drawn from what a 106-question benchmark actually found.

How to tell if an AI is giving you good money answers

An AI money answer arrives fast, reads well, and gives you almost no way to tell whether it's right. That's the whole problem. A stale contribution limit and a current one look identical on screen — same tone, same formatting, same confidence. You can't audit the model. But you can audit the answer, and six checks do most of the work. Ask for one current number you can verify yourself. Check whether it separates rules from opinions. See whether it shows its reasoning, not just its verdict. Notice whether the conclusion comes first. Ask whether it handed you options or a single instruction. And look at whether whoever built it publishes results when their own tool loses. These checks came out of MoneyBench, a benchmark Ed Wealth Research ran on real money questions across Ed, ChatGPT and Gemini. They aren't about Ed. They work on whatever you already have open — and running them once will tell you more in ten minutes than any leaderboard tells you in a year. Adoption surveys disagree sh
EdWealth
·
Sep 07 2026
Three AI systems scored within a third of a point of each other on accuracy — and one was still chosen roughly three times as often. Here's what the MoneyBench data says actually separates a money answer that helps from one that's merely right.

A correct answer and a useful one are not the same thing

Three AI systems answered the same 106 personal finance questions. On raw correctness they finished close together — 3.99, 3.72 and 3.65 on a five-point scale, a spread of about a third of a point. Then scorers were asked which answer they'd actually want, and one system was chosen roughly three times as often as either of the others. That gap is the interesting part. If the three were near-equally correct, the winner wasn't winning on being right. The obvious next guess is that it wrote more nicely — but expression is the dimension where the three converged most, and on one head-to-head the difference isn't even statistically significant. So what was being rewarded? A third property, which the MoneyBench report defines with unusual precision: a useful answer is one that equips the decision it addresses. It identifies the figures that bear on the question, shows how they combine, and states what they imply for the choice at hand. That sounds mild. It turns out to be the whole differenc
EdWealth
·
Sep 04 2026
We ran 106 real money questions through Ed, ChatGPT and Gemini, had them judged blind by an outside model, and fact-checked every answer against live sources. Ed won 62.3% of them. Here's how the test worked.

We tested three AIs on real money questions. Here's what won.

In July 2026 we put 106 real money questions to three AI systems — Ed, ChatGPT and Gemini — and had every answer scored blind, by a judge outside all three systems' model families, with every key fact checked against live sources. Ed won 62.3% of the questions. Gemini took 20.8%. ChatGPT took 17.0%. The full study is published as MoneyBench, including the methodology, the scoring rubric, the limitations and the round we lost. Two things about that number are worth knowing before you read anything else. First, the questions were not written for the test. They were drawn from real queries people had already sent to a personal finance AI — the messy, specific kind, not textbook prompts. Second, the fact-checking pass moved Ed's score down. Before verification Ed sat at 67.6%. After every key fact in every answer was checked against live sources, Ed sat at 62.3% — a 5.3-point cut — while both competitors moved up. Ed still finished first. This article explains what MoneyBench measures and
EdWealth
·
Sep 03 2026
Owning five ETFs doesn't mean you're diversified — 73% of holdings in popular growth ETFs overlap. Here's how to check if your portfolio is secretly one concentrated bet.

Your 5 ETFs might all be making the same bet

Here's a number that'll make you look at your portfolio differently: 94.8% of QQQ's holdings — by weight — are stocks that already live inside VOO. Not a small overlap. Almost complete overlap. If you own both, you're not doubling your diversification. You're mostly just doubling your exposure to the same names — and paying two sets of fund fees to do it. Toss VGT into the mix and it gets stranger. Your top three positions — NVIDIA, Microsoft, and Apple — are now each appearing in three separate funds simultaneously. Three ETFs. Three expense ratios. One concentrated bet on the same handful of companies. This is the ETF overlap problem. It's quiet, it looks like diversification on paper, and it catches a lot of careful people off guard. The simplest way to see what's happening is to pull the top holdings of the three most popular growth and broad-market ETFs side by side. Here's what's sitting inside them as of mid-2026:
EdWealth
·
Sep 02 2026
Feel behind on money? The data says you're probably not. Here are 7 signs of real financial health — each backed by an actual benchmark, from the Fed's $400 test to what most people's debt really looks like.

7 signs you're doing better with money than you think

Short answer: if you have any cash buffer at all, roughly know what you spend, put anything toward retirement, and have never missed a rent or mortgage payment — you're ahead of a large share of American adults on every one of those counts. Feeling behind and being behind are different things, and the data measures only one of them. Here's the strange part about money anxiety: the people who feel it most are often the people doing the work. You compare yourself to a coworker's new car, a cousin's kitchen renovation, a stranger's vacation photos — a highlight reel with no balance sheet attached. Nobody posts their credit card statement. So instead of comparing you to an imaginary person who has it all figured out, this piece compares you to the actual data: what the Federal Reserve, FINRA, and the New York Fed can verify about how Americans really handle money. Not to make anyone feel superior — but because reassurance is only worth something when it's built on evidence. Think of it as
EdWealth
·
Sep 01 2026
Avoiding your bank balance isn't laziness — it's an anxiety response with a name: the ostrich effect. Here's what not looking quietly costs, and the 90-second habit that makes checking feel safe again.

Why you avoid looking at your bank account (and what it's costing you)

The short answer: you avoid your bank account because looking feels like a verdict, and your brain protects you from verdicts. Behavioral economists have a name for this — the ostrich effect — and it's so normal that researchers can measure it at population scale. But avoidance has a quiet price: overdraft fees that only hit people who don't know their balance, subscriptions that bill unnoticed for months, small problems compounding into big ones. The fix is not a full budget audit. It's a 90-second weekly glance at three numbers — enough to shrink the fear without triggering it. You know the move. The banking app sits on your home screen and you scroll past it. A balance alert comes in and you swipe it away without reading the number. Someone asks "can you afford it?" and you say "probably" — because probably doesn't require opening the app. If that's you, here's the first thing to know: nothing is wrong with you. You're not lazy, you're not irresponsible, and you're not uniquely bad
EdWealth
·
Aug 31 2026

Money at peace.Wealth in motion.

Your money, finally handled. Your life, finally unhurried.

Try Ed Free