The Trump administration is pressing European nations to impose travel restrictions on passengers arriving from Ebola-affected African countries, warning that failure to act could trigger tighter US regulations on trans-Atlantic travel including during the World Cup.
"The department's highest priority and focus remain protecting the health of the American people and preventing this Ebola outbreak from reaching our shores," the State Department said in a statement following a call between Secretary of State Marco Rubio and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Tuesday.
A State Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the US "has stepped up" to confront the outbreak and "now the world must do more to step up as well." The official said the US wants financial contributions and "commonsense restrictions on travel from the affected area."
The World Cup tournament opens Thursday in Mexico and runs nearly six weeks, with the United States hosting most of the games. More than 300 direct flights connect Europe and the US daily, compared with relatively few direct flights between Africa and the United States. The US has already banned travelers who have been in one of the affected countries in the previous three weeks from entering the country.
The policy divide widens
The US has contributed more than $200 million to efforts to end the Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda since it was first confirmed last month. The European Union announced Tuesday it was boosting its Ebola response funding by 16.5 million euros ($19 million), on top of 15 million euros ($17.3 million) contributed last month.
The administration's approach has drawn criticism from public health experts. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed published Wednesday, former CDC officials Debra Houry and Krutika Kuppalli argued that the Trump administration's travel restrictions depart from "longstanding principles" without publicly presenting evidence to justify the changes. They noted that the expansion of restrictions to include green-card visa holders was signed by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., with no scientific rationale explaining "why citizenship or immigration status would alter risk of infection or transmission."
The op-ed also highlighted inconsistencies in the administration's repatriation policies. Current CDC guidance recommends active monitoring of individuals with high-risk Ebola exposures, yet recent actions have included transporting exposed Americans to other countries rather than repatriating them to the US. The authors argued this approach "doesn't make sense given Ebola's incubation time of two to 21 days."
Quarantine facility sparks backlash in Kenya
The US is constructing a quarantine facility in Nanyuki, Kenya, to monitor American citizens who have had high-risk exposure to Ebola in the Democratic Republic of Congo, South Sudan, or Uganda. The State Department said Kenya was selected "due to proximity, airports in the region having limited capability, and to ensure Americans can be evaluated and receive assistance in a timely matter."
The facility has sparked protests in Kenya, with police firing tear gas on demonstrators in Nanyuki on Tuesday. Last week, two protesters were fatally shot. A high court in the country has ruled against the facility following a lawsuit brought by the Nairobi-based Katiba Institute, which challenged whether the government could "expose the public to such significant risks without complying with constitutional safeguards."
The US has committed $13.5 million to Kenya to support the country's own Ebola response efforts. So far, only one American has contracted Ebola, according to PBS.
Public health specialists have questioned the approach. Nahid Bhadelia, who directs Boston University's Center on Emerging Infectious Diseases, said the facility "does not make America safer" and "actually makes us less secure when the rest of the world is this pissed off at us." Craig Spencer, an emergency medicine physician at Brown University who contracted Ebola in Guinea in 2014, said the policy represents "build the wall, but for viruses."
The last time the US imposed broad travel restrictions during a health emergency was during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, when the Trump administration restricted travel from China and later Europe. Those measures were criticized by public health officials for being implemented without coordination with international partners, a pattern critics say is repeating with the current Ebola response.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.