BFA Law is investigating Barry Diller's $48.30-per-share bid for MGM Resorts, a price 27.7% above the stock's $37.81 close on Sept. 18 but 6.4% below its 52-week high of $51.59.
BFA Law is investigating Barry Diller's $48.30-per-share bid for MGM Resorts, a price 27.7% above the stock's $37.81 close on Sept. 18 but 6.4% below its 52-week high of $51.59.

A securities-law review of Barry Diller's proposed MGM Resorts International takeover has put a $48.30-a-share price tag under scrutiny, a level 27.7 percent above the casino operator's Sept. 18 close of $37.81 and roughly $12.15 billion of implied equity value.
"Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that it is investigating Barry Diller's bid to buy MGM Resorts International," the firm said in a Sept. 23 statement from New York. The firm did not disclose the specific terms, timing or grounds of the review.
The gap between the offer and the market price is the number that matters. MGM closed at $37.81 on the New York Stock Exchange on Sept. 18, down 1.3 percent, leaving the stock 26.7 percent below its 52-week high of $51.59 and 29.6 percent above its 52-week low of $29.19, according to MarketBeat and Robinhood quote data. At $37.81, MGM carried a market capitalization of about $9.51 billion as of Sept. 19; applying the $48.30 offer to that share count implies an equity value near $12.15 billion, a $2.64 billion step-up that any fairness challenge would have to justify.
Trading has already thickened around the news. Volume reached 7,850,000 shares against an average of 2,780,000, with an intraday range of $37.50 to $38.45 on Sept. 19, roughly 2.8 times normal turnover. Institutional filings in September show the split: Corient Private Wealth LP and the California State Teachers Retirement System reduced positions, while Tidal Investments LLC and Wellington Management Group LLP added, according to MarketBeat's news feed.
For a shareholder deciding whether to tender, the arithmetic is simple and the legal question is not. A $48.30 bid represents a 27.7 percent premium to the last close, but it lands 6.4 percent below the 52-week high of $51.59 — meaning investors who bought near the peak would still be selling at a loss even if the deal closed at the offered price. That is the kind of spread that typically draws scrutiny over whether the board ran a process that captured full value, and it is the reason a law firm announcement alone can move the risk calculus before any complaint is filed.
The comparison to MGM's own trading history sharpens the point. The stock has recovered 29.6 percent from its 52-week low of $29.19, so the offer is being measured against a share price that has already re-rated upward on BetMGM momentum rather than against a distressed base. BetMGM launched The Traitors Faithful Riches in Alberta and Ontario and was named the official sports betting and online casino partner of the Minnesota Vikings on Sept. 10, 2026, both of which support a higher standalone valuation case — and a higher bar for any acquirer arguing $48.30 is full price.
No deal terms beyond the $48.30 figure have been disclosed, and BFA Law has not stated whether it has filed a complaint or is only soliciting shareholders. Until the firm clarifies its grounds or a definitive agreement surfaces with a premium, financing structure and closing timeline, MGM shares are likely to trade on legal headlines rather than on casino fundamentals. The immediate reference points are the $37.81 close, the $48.30 offer and the $51.59 peak — three numbers that define the range in which the fairness debate will be settled.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.