ESG funds see $65.7B in outflows as backlash reshapes investing

U.S. ESG mutual funds have shed $65.7 billion since spring 2022, a 20% outflow rate that has reshaped how the asset management industry approaches sustainable investing.

The ESG investing movement that tripled in size between 2018 and 2021 has lost $65.7 billion to net investor selling since the second quarter of 2022, driven by a political backlash and persistent underperformance relative to the broader market.

"The outflows have been driven by both the anti-woke political noise and by ESG funds' recent underperformance due to many being underweighted in the Magnificent Seven and AI stocks that have driven market returns," said Ed Farrington, president of sustainability-focused Impax Asset Management.

The outflows represent 20% of the funds' average assets since early 2022, though cumulative returns of 34.9% — fueled by the broader U.S. stock market — have lifted total ESG mutual fund assets to $350.7 billion as of March 2026, just below the record $367.5 billion at year-end 2025, according to Morningstar. Fund launches collapsed from a peak of 116 in 2021 to just nine in 2025, while a record 91 funds were closed. BlackRock, which gained the No. 1 U.S. ESG manager spot by tripling its fund count to 68 between 2019 and 2023, halted use of the term ESG entirely, with Chief Executive Officer Larry Fink saying it had been "weaponized."

The retrenchment has not eliminated the underlying concerns that fueled ESG's rise — it has driven them underground. Institutional investors including the California Public Employees' Retirement System, the largest U.S. state pension fund with $620 billion in assets, are now pursuing sustainability goals more quietly, cutting proxy votes and rebranding their approach as "sustainability integration" rather than ESG. Calpers plans to boost its current $60 billion in climate solutions assets to $100 billion by 2030, suggesting the structural shift toward sustainable investing continues even as the label fades.

The Biggest Losers

Among active ESG managers, the impact has been most severe at Parnassus Investments, which fell from the No. 1 U.S. ESG manager in 2019 to No. 4, behind index-fund giants BlackRock, Vanguard Group and State Street, according to Morningstar. The $24.2 billion Parnassus Core Equity Fund (PRBLX), which holds just 37 stocks and excludes fossil fuels, weapons, tobacco and alcohol, has suffered investor withdrawals of $18.4 billion since late 2021 through June of this year. Its assets are down 25% from their 2021 peak of $32.3 billion, cushioned only by the rising stock market.

The No. 1 spot among individual ESG funds now belongs to Vanguard FTSE Social Index Fund (VFTAX) with $28 billion as of May 31. The Vanguard fund holds 381 stocks and excludes oil, gas and coal companies, alcohol, tobacco and weapons — a broader approach that has helped it retain assets.

Proxy Voting Retreats

The three largest index-fund managers — BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street, which together own 20% or more of most big U.S. companies' stock — have cut back their support for ESG proxy proposals in recent years. BlackRock reduced its votes on environmental and social issues from 40% to 4%, arguing that companies have made sufficient progress on climate-related disclosures since 2021. The firm also withdrew from a net-zero climate investment initiative and now allows fund investors to steer their own proxy voting decisions.

Utah State Treasurer Marlo Oaks, who chairs the anti-ESG State Financial Officers Foundation, described the decline in pro-ESG proxy voting as the most important change in the space, calling it "a top down centralized control agenda." Eight red states pulled more than $12 billion from BlackRock funds during the backlash, though BlackRock was removed from a Texas blacklist of pro-ESG money managers in 2025 after making overtures to state officials.

Overall, ESG shareholder proposals put to a vote declined by more than 20% during the 2024-25 proxy season, according to Calpers, possibly reflecting new regulations giving companies greater freedom to exclude such proposals from the ballot.

Farrington at Impax said he believes the impact of the backlash has "run its course," arguing that ESG isn't dead because it provides useful information about companies' resilience. The data suggests a bifurcated future: the ESG label itself may continue to lose political and marketing value, but the underlying practice of integrating environmental and governance risks into investment decisions is becoming standard practice. Calpers' approach — dropping the term while expanding climate-related investments — may become the template for institutional investors navigating a politically charged environment.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.